• Home
  • About The Herald
  • Local Agencies
  • Daily Email Update
  • Legal Notices
  • Classified Ads

Contra Costa Herald

News Of By and For The People of Contra Costa County, California

  • Arts & Entertainment
  • Business
  • Community
  • Crime
  • Dining
  • Education
  • Faith
  • Health
  • News
  • Politics & Elections
  • Real Estate

County Elections Department provides update, still counting 108,000 remaining ballots

November 12, 2018 By Publisher Leave a Comment

By Paul Burgarino, Community Education and Engagement Specialist, Contra Costa County Clerk-Recorder-Elections Department

Results from the November 6th General Election have been updated on the Contra Costa Elections website, as of Friday, Nov. 9th at 5:00 p.m. You can view the Update 1 here. The Contra Costa Elections Division has processed over 1.7 million ballot cards to this point.

Please note that the updated results are still unofficial.

The Elections Division estimates that there are about 82,000 Vote-By-Mail envelopes remaining to be counted, as well as 25,000 Provisionals and 1,000 Conditional Voter Registrations.

Our next scheduled update is at 5:00 pm on Friday, November 16th.

The Elections Department has 28 days to certify the election results. So, close races may not be decided until the beginning of December.

Allen Payton contributed to this report.

Filed Under: News, Politics & Elections

Payton Perspective: Re-elect Joel Keller to BART Board

November 3, 2018 By Publisher Leave a Comment

Joel Keller at Antioch BART Station opening 5-25-18. Photo by Allen Payton

Usually, I don’t recommend elected officials serving in the same office for 24 years, such as Joel Keller, who was elected to the BART Board on the same night in November 1994 that I was elected to the Antioch City Council. That’s because elected representatives tend to become complacent or arrogant in office and stop listening to their constituents, and end up doing the bidding of the powerful, special interests who support them and contribute to their re-election campaigns.

However, Joel is different. Having served on the Contra Costa Transportation Authority and three of the four transportation boards in East County, including as Chairman of the Bypass Authority in 1998 when we purchased the right-of-way for the State Route 4 extension (aka The Bypass) from Lone Tree Way to Balfour Road, I’ve learned the difficult lesson that infrastructure projects can take a long time. Too much time for most all of our liking. But, that’s another issue. My point is, it’s taken that time for Joel to get BART extended to Antioch.

Although it’s not full or “real” BART, as we Antioch residents would have preferred, the bottom line is Joel was able to wade through the funding limitations from BART and the federal government, as well as the opposition by other regions in the BART District and directors who represent those regions and make his promise and commitment a reality. Antioch has a BART station. During his next four years, if re-elected, I believe Joel will be able to help deliver further extensions in East County, first to Laurel Road – which will benefit Antioch’s economic development area for job creation and serve the residents of Oakley – then to Brentwood near Sand Creek Road.

Joel has done what he said he would do, and he listens to his constituents. Most recently, Joel heard the complaints about safety on the BART system. In order to ensure the rest of the board members heard the complaints from the people in his district who can’t attend their normal day time meetings in Oakland, had the board hold a night time meeting in Pittsburg. Then, due to the overwhelming response by riders to the opening of the Antioch BART Station, Joel heard the outcry for more parking spaces, and he delivered by getting the other BART Board Members to join him in voting to fund 800 more spaces.

I believe Joel has earned one more term on the BART Board, which most likely will be his last, and recommend we re-elect him.

Filed Under: BART, Opinion, Politics & Elections

Clayton candidate for Secretary of State, Mark Meuser has best grassroots campaign in California

November 3, 2018 By Publisher Leave a Comment

By Ryan Hughes (@RyanHughesCA), DollarDollarBill.com (republished with permission)
Oct. 24, 2018

In American political campaigns, cash rules everything. Candidates and elected officials spend countless hours raising money to pay for their commercials, mailers, and door hangers. But candidates differ in how they raise enough money to be competitive.

Dollar Dollar Bill wanted to find out who 2018’s biggest—and smallest—grassroots fundraisers were. Our full methodology is explained below, but the short version is this: we calculated the percentage of each candidate’s donors who gave $200 or less, but excluded any candidate who had not raised at least $100,000.

So whose campaign is raising the most grassroots money in 2018?

Candidate District Total Raised Grassroots ($) Grassroots (%)
Mark Meuser (R) SOS $ 261,187.46 $ 128,800.74 49.31%
Jovanka Beckles (D) AD15 $ 350,499.34 $ 99,997.20 28.53%
William Ostrander (D) AD35 $ 109,049.90 $ 28,446.06 26.09%
Jacalyn Smith (D) AD06 $ 135,137.29 $ 31,991.51 23.67%
Joy Silver (D) SD28 $ 509,409.42 $ 71,888.03 14.11%
Steven Bailey (R) AG $ 501,228.98 $ 56,053.61 11.18%
Buffy Wicks (D) AD15 $ 1,134,729.48 $ 90,251.91 7.95%
John Cox (R) CAGOV $ 12,145,288.73 $ 878,300.09 7.23%
Cottie Petrie-Norris (D) AD74 $ 435,364.07 $ 31,213.18 7.17%
Alexandria Coronado (R) AD65 $ 199,364.08 $ 13,874.00 6.96%

At the top of the list is Mark Meuser, the Republican candidate for Secretary of State. He attributed his grassroots fundraising success to his campaign’s considerable travels throughout the state to speak to political and civic groups—and he has numbers: 825 events, 92,500 miles driven, a 58-county bike tour over 46 days, and air travel on top of all that. “We’ve been very good at handing out campaign contribution envelopes right there when I’m speaking,” said Meuser. During our interview, Meuser was southbound on I-5 to headline an event that night for a Republican congressional candidate.

Joy Silver, the Democratic candidate for Senate District 28, attributed her success in grassroots fundraising to her having been an organizer before she began running for office. “I am a grassroots candidate because I was working as a grassroots organizer,” explained Silver. Following the 2018 election, she helped organize a group to oppose Trump Administration policies. “They wanted me to run, so I became the voice of those people.”

Asked how much time she spends fundraising, Silver paused and joked, “I’m trying to think of what else I do.”
On the other end of the spectrum are candidates who raised almost no money from grassroots sources. California has ten candidates who raised less than one tenth of one percent of their campaign funds from grassroots donors:

Candidate District Total Raised Grassroots ($) Grassroots (%)
Miguel Santiago (D) AD53 $ 1,238,791.76 $ 1,125.00 0.09%
Wendy Carrillo (D) AD51 $ 448,769.86 $ 375.50 0.08%
Blanca Rubio (D) AD48 $ 1,074,290.57 $ 880.50 0.08%
Lorena Gonzalez (D) AD80 $ 1,724,427.89 $ 1,403.00 0.08%
Ken Cooley (D) AD08 $ 625,057.51 $ 450.00 0.07%
Ian Calderon (D) AD57 $ 1,145,958.17 $ 736.00 0.06%
Jim Cooper (D) AD09 $ 2,002,785.01 $ 1,210.00 0.06%
Joel Anderson (R) BOE04 $ 449,001.08 $ 235.00 0.05%
Marie Waldron (R) AD75 $ 544,437.22 $ 189.97 0.03%
Mike Gipson (D) AD64 $ 981,334.48 $ 102.20 0.01%

All of these candidates are incumbent members of the Legislature, and only one of them is seeking higher office: Joel Anderson for Board of Equalization.

At the very bottom of grassroots fundraising this cycle is Mike Gipson, a Democratic Assemblymember from South Los Angeles, who raised 0.01% of his campaign contributions from grassroots sources. Of the nearly $1 million he raised, only $102.20 came from grassroots sources.

How much have your local candidates raised in grassroots contributions? All candidates for the 2018 General Election who raised at least $100,000:

Candidate District Total Raised Grassroots ($) Grassroots (%)
Mark Meuser (R) SOS $ 261,187.46 $ 128,800.74 49.31%
Jovanka Beckles (D) AD15 $ 350,499.34 $ 99,997.20 28.53%
William Ostrander (D) AD35 $ 109,049.90 $ 28,446.06 26.09%
Jacalyn Smith (D) AD06 $ 135,137.29 $ 31,991.51 23.67%
Joy Silver (D) SD28 $ 509,409.42 $ 71,888.03 14.11%
Steven Bailey (R) AG $ 501,228.98 $ 56,053.61 11.18%
Buffy Wicks (D) AD15 $ 1,134,729.48 $ 90,251.91 7.95%
John Cox (R) CAGOV $ 12,145,288.73 $ 878,300.09 7.23%
Cottie Petrie-Norris (D) AD74 $ 435,364.07 $ 31,213.18 7.17%
Alexandria Coronado (R) AD65 $ 199,364.08 $ 13,874.00 6.96%
Mike Mc Guire (D) SD02 $ 1,541,581.86 $ 102,039.18 6.62%
Sunday Gover (D) AD77 $ 471,297.26 $ 30,756.22 6.53%
Tasha Boerner Horvath (D) AD76 $ 412,747.96 $ 24,435.96 5.92%
Tepring Michelle Piquado (D) AD54 $ 168,735.08 $ 9,959.58 5.90%
Alan Geraci (D) AD75 $ 142,171.37 $ 7,736.44 5.44%
Gavin Newsom (D) CAGOV $ 41,931,831.24 $ 2,160,446.32 5.15%
Janet Nguyen (R) SD34 $ 1,947,105.29 $ 96,779.01 4.97%
Mark Stone (D) AD29 $ 468,134.57 $ 20,875.94 4.46%
Konstantinos Roditis (R) CON $ 117,214.99 $ 5,114.99 4.36%
Michael Eng (D) SD22 $ 2,449,071.73 $ 101,798.46 4.16%
Rebecca Bauer-Kahan (D) AD16 $ 958,349.83 $ 39,094.37 4.08%
Xavier Becerra (D) AG $ 6,798,507.78 $ 266,470.77 3.92%
Jesse Gabriel (D) AD45 $ 947,466.05 $ 36,115.36 3.81%
Frank Scotto (R) AD66 $ 725,034.58 $ 27,107.00 3.74%
Marshall Tuck (D) SPI $ 4,276,700.13 $ 126,421.19 2.96%
Brian Jones (R) SD38 $ 926,033.24 $ 24,481.00 2.64%
Richard Pan (D) SD06 $ 1,331,028.76 $ 33,510.67 2.52%
James Gallagher (R) AD03 $ 1,126,179.33 $ 28,326.88 2.52%
Malia Cohen (D) BOE02 $ 909,361.61 $ 22,467.00 2.47%
Kevin Kiley (R) AD06 $ 676,588.65 $ 16,004.98 2.37%
Maria Elena Durazo (D) SD24 $ 1,206,722.95 $ 28,406.00 2.35%
Fiona Ma (D) TREAS $ 3,454,286.07 $ 77,226.71 2.24%
Ash Kalra (D) AD27 $ 482,134.00 $ 10,114.00 2.10%
Robert Rivas (D) AD30 $ 702,549.27 $ 14,390.00 2.05%
Josh Lowenthal (D) AD72 $ 1,340,146.42 $ 26,857.17 2.00%
Catharine Baker (R) AD16 $ 2,043,507.26 $ 38,367.27 1.88%
Al Muratsuchi (D) AD66 $ 1,354,823.00 $ 25,039.53 1.85%
Melissa Hurtado (D) SD14 $ 653,284.33 $ 11,939.18 1.83%
S. Monique Limon (D) AD37 $ 876,953.00 $ 15,135.49 1.73%
Andreas Borgeas (R) SD08 $ 894,384.98 $ 15,412.19 1.72%
Edwin Chau (D) AD49 $ 596,739.75 $ 9,950.00 1.67%
Bob Archuleta (D) SD32 $ 518,724.83 $ 8,602.00 1.66%
Kevin Mullin (D) AD22 $ 844,571.10 $ 13,634.00 1.61%
Susan Rubio (D) SD22 $ 837,248.66 $ 13,356.00 1.60%
Betty Yee (D) CON $ 2,194,307.05 $ 34,581.43 1.58%
Melissa Melendez (R) AD67 $ 401,288.04 $ 6,075.00 1.51%
Jordan Cunningham (R) AD35 $ 1,020,896.61 $ 15,126.66 1.48%
Laura Friedman (D) AD43 $ 748,804.12 $ 11,013.08 1.47%
Bob Wieckowski (D) SD10 $ 946,622.22 $ 13,881.14 1.47%
Shannon Grove (R) SD16 $ 1,512,205.91 $ 21,661.76 1.43%
Kansen Chu (D) AD25 $ 449,819.16 $ 6,436.31 1.43%
Christy Smith (D) AD38 $ 1,275,279.76 $ 18,227.72 1.43%
James Wood (D) AD02 $ 1,103,126.85 $ 15,259.91 1.38%
Devon Mathis (R) AD26 $ 441,166.09 $ 6,049.92 1.37%
Connie Leyva (D) SD20 $ 1,301,747.12 $ 17,835.00 1.37%
Tyler Diep (R) AD72 $ 907,191.79 $ 12,187.00 1.34%
Henry Nickel (R) AD40 $ 282,813.12 $ 3,787.68 1.34%
Bill Quirk (D) AD20 $ 643,019.42 $ 8,534.00 1.33%
Steven Choi (R) AD68 $ 245,853.00 $ 3,203.00 1.30%
Ben Allen (D) SD26 $ 1,690,309.04 $ 21,782.00 1.29%
Thomas Umberg (D) SD34 $ 1,085,928.14 $ 13,193.17 1.21%
David Chiu (D) AD17 $ 1,395,785.39 $ 16,769.01 1.20%
Patrick O’Donnell (D) AD70 $ 1,030,713.79 $ 12,294.00 1.19%
Susan Eggman (D) AD13 $ 1,023,635.71 $ 12,056.19 1.18%
Evan Low (D) AD28 $ 2,040,144.24 $ 24,026.25 1.18%
Edward Hernandez (D) LG $ 3,672,188.78 $ 42,041.00 1.14%
Todd Gloria (D) AD78 $ 866,625.10 $ 9,730.00 1.12%
Sharon Quirk-Silva (D) AD65 $ 1,676,466.92 $ 18,797.97 1.12%
Cecilia Aguiar-Curry (D) AD04 $ 788,054.20 $ 8,676.69 1.10%
Vincent Fong (R) AD34 $ 1,071,066.11 $ 11,237.98 1.05%
Marc Berman (D) AD24 $ 715,198.24 $ 7,456.20 1.04%
Sydney Kamlager (D) AD54 $ 571,669.75 $ 5,880.00 1.03%
Joaquin Arambula (D) AD31 $ 898,302.70 $ 8,899.31 0.99%
Justin Mendes (R) AD32 $ 653,832.91 $ 6,085.00 0.93%
Jacqui Irwin (D) AD44 $ 1,233,253.50 $ 11,356.00 0.92%
Cristina Garcia (D) AD58 $ 807,374.70 $ 7,318.69 0.91%
Mohammad-Ali Mazarei (R) AD61 $ 114,356.04 $ 1,035.54 0.91%
Eloise Gomez Reyes (D) AD47 $ 681,258.32 $ 6,144.70 0.90%
Bill Essayli (R) AD60 $ 629,253.31 $ 5,626.17 0.89%
Shirley Weber (D) AD79 $ 719,040.24 $ 6,394.00 0.89%
Randy Voepel (R) AD71 $ 162,010.00 $ 1,400.00 0.86%
Jim Frazier (D) AD11 $ 1,071,153.60 $ 9,248.99 0.86%
Adrin Nazarian (D) AD46 $ 827,127.82 $ 7,127.99 0.86%
Alex Padilla (D) SOS $ 1,769,469.14 $ 14,767.13 0.83%
Tim Grayson (D) AD14 $ 1,089,670.33 $ 8,911.04 0.82%
Eleni Kounalakis (D) LG $ 6,948,261.57 $ 54,581.58 0.79%
James Ramos (D) AD40 $ 1,561,945.06 $ 11,711.32 0.75%
Andy Vidak (R) SD14 $ 1,786,180.52 $ 12,895.00 0.72%
Ted Gaines (R) BOE01 $ 840,303.33 $ 6,015.00 0.72%
Jim Nielsen (R) SD04 $ 997,447.79 $ 7,115.00 0.71%
Tony Vazquez (D) BOE03 $ 358,674.35 $ 2,501.11 0.70%
Pat Bates (R) SD36 $ 1,540,644.65 $ 10,658.45 0.69%
Dante Acosta (R) AD38 $ 914,428.76 $ 6,162.00 0.67%
Luz Rivas (D) AD39 $ 334,456.14 $ 2,108.03 0.63%
Chad Mayes (R) AD42 $ 1,213,756.31 $ 7,576.30 0.62%
Rob Bonta (D) AD18 $ 2,628,260.37 $ 15,647.88 0.60%
Brian Dahle (R) AD01 $ 1,437,744.65 $ 8,493.84 0.59%
Eduardo Garcia (D) AD56 $ 747,383.28 $ 4,298.00 0.58%
Heath Flora (R) AD12 $ 490,837.33 $ 2,772.25 0.56%
Ricardo Lara (D) IC $ 2,065,769.09 $ 11,560.35 0.56%
Sabrina Cervantes (D) AD60 $ 1,748,736.69 $ 9,754.70 0.56%
Jose Medina (D) AD61 $ 615,600.64 $ 3,386.32 0.55%
Marc Levine (D) AD10 $ 1,755,336.86 $ 9,509.85 0.54%
Jeffrey Stone (R) SD28 $ 537,258.00 $ 2,769.00 0.52%
Holly Mitchell (D) SD30 $ 1,279,003.18 $ 6,305.96 0.49%
Jim Patterson (R) AD23 $ 784,863.17 $ 3,800.00 0.48%
Robert Poythress (R) SD12 $ 1,812,471.53 $ 8,620.00 0.48%
Frank Bigelow (R) AD05 $ 1,413,518.61 $ 6,460.00 0.46%
Bill Brough (R) AD73 $ 623,975.43 $ 2,823.00 0.45%
Tony Thurmond (D) SPI $ 702,140.37 $ 3,097.22 0.44%
Anna Caballero (D) SD12 $ 2,114,695.50 $ 9,109.16 0.43%
Phillip Chen (R) AD55 $ 669,264.64 $ 2,697.24 0.40%
Kevin Mc Carty (D) AD07 $ 737,720.29 $ 2,896.98 0.39%
Jay Obernolte (R) AD33 $ 503,331.01 $ 1,962.72 0.39%
Phil Ting (D) AD19 $ 1,753,400.32 $ 6,723.66 0.38%
Matthew Harper (R) AD74 $ 264,870.98 $ 999.00 0.38%
Richard Bloom (D) AD50 $ 579,022.28 $ 2,130.00 0.37%
Thomas Lackey (R) AD36 $ 629,275.51 $ 2,225.59 0.35%
Adam Gray (D) AD21 $ 1,352,561.49 $ 4,321.34 0.32%
Brian Maienschein (R) AD77 $ 1,768,749.36 $ 4,794.00 0.27%
Steve Poizner (N) IC $ 2,051,395.50 $ 5,052.18 0.25%
Robert Hertzberg (D) SD18 $ 2,023,911.11 $ 4,933.66 0.24%
Freddie Rodriguez (D) AD52 $ 890,116.53 $ 1,668.81 0.19%
Reggie Jones-Sawyer Sr. (D) AD59 $ 486,944.48 $ 800.00 0.16%
Autumn Burke (D) AD62 $ 1,218,879.76 $ 1,726.19 0.14%
Chris Holden (D) AD41 $ 931,964.47 $ 1,295.36 0.14%
Rudy Salas Jr. (D) AD32 $ 1,390,765.38 $ 1,897.00 0.14%
Tom Daly (D) AD69 $ 1,513,510.53 $ 1,993.00 0.13%
Ben Hueso (D) SD40 $ 1,114,985.56 $ 1,350.00 0.12%
Anthony Rendon (D) AD63 $ 2,901,621.03 $ 3,230.41 0.11%
Miguel Santiago (D) AD53 $ 1,238,791.76 $ 1,125.00 0.09%
Wendy Carrillo (D) AD51 $ 448,769.86 $ 375.50 0.08%
Blanca Rubio (D) AD48 $ 1,074,290.57 $ 880.50 0.08%
Lorena Gonzalez (D) AD80 $ 1,724,427.89 $ 1,403.00 0.08%
Ken Cooley (D) AD08 $ 625,057.51 $ 450.00 0.07%
Ian Calderon (D) AD57 $ 1,145,958.17 $ 736.00 0.06%
Jim Cooper (D) AD09 $ 2,002,785.01 $ 1,210.00 0.06%
Joel Anderson (R) BOE04 $ 449,001.08 $ 235.00 0.05%
Marie Waldron (R) AD75 $ 544,437.22 $ 189.97 0.03%
Mike Gipson (D) AD64 $ 981,334.48 $ 102.20 0.01%

Methodology
All data for this analysis comes from campaign reports filed through the last Form 460 reporting date, September 22, 2018.

We summed each candidate’s contributions less than $100 (reported as a lump sum on Form 460, Schedule A, Line 2). Then we added to that total each candidate’s contributions this cycle that were $200 or less, but excluded any contributor who donated multiple times for a sum exceeding $200. That figure is “Grassroots ($)”, above.
Then we summed up the total number of contributions and the net of loans made to a campaign (loans received less loans repaid). That figure is “Total Raised”, above.

We removed any candidate who had not raised at least $100,000 as a means to control for data skewing by candidates who are not viable. We then calculated the portion of a candidate’s funds that are grassroots, i.e., from contributors giving $200 or less. We used a percentage in our rankings instead of total grassroots dollars in order to compare districts that are geographically and economically diverse.

To note, it is not possible to calculate the average contribution for California candidates from publicly available information. As noted above, all contributions less than $100 are reported as a lump sum without reporting the number of people contributing under $100. For example, if a candidate reports $1,000 worth of contributions under $100, that may have come from 11 people contributing $90.91 or 1,000 people contributing $1. Without knowing how many people actually contributed, calculating an average contribution amount is not possible.

NOTE: The publisher of the Herald is the campaign manager for Mark Meuser for Secretary of State.

Filed Under: News, Politics & Elections

Contra Costa secures voting on Election Day

November 2, 2018 By Publisher Leave a Comment

By Paul Burgarino, Community Education and Engagement Specialist, Contra Costa County Clerk-Recorder-Elections Department

Current law allows voters who are issued a Vote-By-Mail ballot to turn it in and vote at the polls on Election Day. Besides being a waste of taxpayer dollars, it has resulted in the possibility of a voter casting more than one ballot without immediate detection.

With many recent reports of voters across the state receiving multiple ballots, the Contra Costa Elections Division has reviewed and updated its processes at polling places to ensure election integrity and prevent double voting.

“We encourage all voters who have been sent a Vote-By-Mail ballot to vote and return that ballot either through the mail, using one of our 23 drop boxes, or at any polling place on Election Day,” said Joe Canciamilla, Contra Costa Clerk-Recorder-Registrar of Voters. “Requesting a second ballot on Election Day contributes to lines, delays, unnecessary costs as well as security concerns.”

Here how it works: Vote-By-Mail voters who show up at their home polling place to vote need to bring the ballot return envelope addressed to them as well as all six cards that comprise the ballot. Upon confirmation that the voter is in the right location and verification of the envelope and ballot cards, the voter signs a declaration and is offered a non-provisional ballot.

If a Vote-By-Mail voter is in the wrong location or cannot provide all of those items, the voter is issued a provisional ballot. A provisional ballot is the same as a “regular” ballot. The difference is that the Elections Division verifies that the voter has not already voted before the ballot is counted. In June 2018, 90 percent of the provisional ballots were counted after this review.

If a voter who previously requested to be mailed a ballot prefers to vote at the polls on Election Day in the future, we encourage them to cancel their permanent vote by mail status by calling our office or re-registering.

For more information, contact the Elections Division at 925-335-7800 or go to www.cocovote.us.

Filed Under: News, Politics & Elections

Registration opportunity remains at early voting sites in Contra Costa County beginning today

November 1, 2018 By Publisher Leave a Comment

Antioch, Richmond and Walnut Creek locations

The voter registration deadline has passed, but you can still register and vote in one transaction. Several convenient locations will be available leading up to and during Election Day for you to register to vote and cast your ballot.

Contra Costa Elections Division offers Conditional Voter Registration as a safety net for those who were unable to complete or update their voter registration before the deadline.

“We want to make sure that everybody who is eligible to register to vote has ample opportunity to cast their ballot,” said Joe Canciamilla, Contra Costa Registrar of Voters.

The Conditional Registration steps include going to an eligible county location, filling out a form that includes your name, address, date of birth and either the last four digits of your Social Security Number or your driver’s license number, and casting your ballot.

Conditionally voted ballots are processed once our office completes the verification of the voter registrations and confirms no ballot has already been voted.

This service will be available starting today at the Elections Office during normal business hours and on Election Day from 7:00 am to 8:00 pm.

Conditional Voter Registration will also be available at the following Regional Early Voting locations on November 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 5th:

  • Antioch: Antioch Community Center, 4703 Lone Tree Way
  • Richmond: Bay Hill Community Church, 4000 Klose Way
  • Walnut Creek: Walnut Creek City Hall, 1666 North Main Street.

Regional Early Voting will be available from 11:00 am to 7:00 pm on the weekdays and 8:00 am to 5:00 pm Saturday, November 3rd. These locations are available to all Contra Costa voters looking to cast their ballot ahead of time and avoid the Election Day rush. Any Contra Costa voter can vote at any one of the Regional Early Voting locations.

For more information, call 925-335-7800.

Filed Under: News, Politics & Elections

Rep. DeSaulnier to host Town Hall Meeting in Richmond Oct. 23

October 20, 2018 By Publisher Leave a Comment

Congressman Mark DeSaulnier (D, CA-11) will host a town hall meeting at Lovonya DeJean Middle School in Richmond on Tuesday, October 23, 2018 at 6:30 p.m.

This will be Congressman DeSaulnier’s 74th town hall and mobile district office hour since coming to Congress in January 2015. During the town hall, Congressman DeSaulnier will provide a legislative update on what is happening in Washington, take questions from constituents, and discuss the services his office can provide.

Richmond Town Hall
Tuesday, October 23, 2018
6:30 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.
Lovonya DeJean Middle School
Multipurpose Room
3400 Macdonald Avenue
Richmond, CA 94805
Doors Open at 6:00 p.m.

This event is open to the public, press, and photographers.
Please RSVP by visiting https://desaulnier.house.gov/town-hall-rsvp or calling 925-933-2660. To request ADA accommodations, translation services, or for more information, contact Congressman DeSaulnier’s office in either Richmond or Walnut Creek.

Filed Under: News, Politics & Elections, West County

County election equipment to undergo testing to ensure accuracy

October 15, 2018 By Publisher Leave a Comment

Ballots lined up to be counted in the County Elections office on Tuesday, November 15, 2016. Photo by Contra Costa County Clerk-Recorder Joe Canciamilla

In an effort to ensure that every Contra Costa ballot is counted completely and accurately, technicians from the Elections Division are in the process of programming and testing every piece of voting equipment that will be used in the November 6, 2018 General Election.

The central-count voting system for Vote-by-Mail ballots and the scanners for paper ballots located at each polling place are being tested for logic and accuracy. The ballot-marking equipment used at Regional Early Voting locations and on Election Day is also tested at this time since it interacts with those counting systems.

The series of tests starts by confirming that all machines are in working order and functioning properly, followed by a series of test ballots running through each machine to make sure they are properly programmed to pick up intended ballot marks.

There are six central count machines that will record results for approximately 2 million Vote-by-Mail ballot cards, along with about 300 ballot scanners at polling places throughout the County.

The public is always invited to check out the equipment testing in action. Those interested in observing the process should contact the Elections Division at 925-335-7805, as testing is being conducted intermittently during the next several weeks and at multiple locations.

A public demonstration of the central count voting equipment is scheduled for 10:00 am on November 2, 2018, at the Contra Costa Clerk-Recorder-Elections Office, 555 Escobar Street in Martinez. Visitors are asked to check-in at the Elections lobby. For more information, call 925-335-7800.

Filed Under: News, Politics & Elections

Televised candidate roundtables for Local Election Preview now available online 24/7 and “On the Air”

October 4, 2018 By Publisher Leave a Comment

Photo courtesy of Contra Costa County.

“Lights. Camera. Action!”  Contra Costa voters can now see and hear where local candidates stand on important issues through televised roundtable discussions and forums. Local “Election Preview” offers Contra Costa voters a chance to be educated on candidates and issues before casting their ballots.

Contra Costa County Elections Division partners with the County’s Contra Costa Television (CCTV), the League of Women Voters of Diablo Valley, the League of Women Voters of West Contra Costa and the Contra Costa County Library to provide candidate forum programming for Fall Elections 2018. “Election Preview” shows begin airing this week on TV and online.

“We’re happy to provide this incredible resource that gives voters the opportunity to educate themselves about important issues,” Contra Costa Registrar of Voters Joe Canciamilla said. “Decisions made at the local level have the greatest impact on our daily lives, and without this program, voters likely might not have any other chance to see and hear from these candidates.”

“With the support of the Board of Supervisors, election preview shows on Contra Costa Television continue to be a priority,” said Susan Shiu, Director of the County’s Office of Communications and Media, which oversees CCTV. “We’ve been airing voter education shows since 1996. Now through television and social media channels, voters can have more access to information ahead of the November 6th election.”

This year’s production featured well-known journalists as moderators, including KCBS radio reporters Bob Butler and Doug Sovern, ABC7 News reporter Laura Anthony, KTVU reporters Alex Savidge and Claudine Wong, and former ABC7 News reporter Alan Wang who is a public information officer for Contra Costa County’s Employment and Human Services Department.

As part of the Election Preview partnership, the Contra Costa County Library is hosting Candidate Forums at local libraries that will be streamed live on its Facebook page. For a list of upcoming public forums, go to: https://ccclib.org/pressroom/pressreleases/2018/CandidateForums.jpg

A total of 39 local races and ballot measures will be available for viewing on Contra Costa Television broadcast channels leading up to Election Day. “Election Preview” roundtables and forums can be seen 24/7 on the Contra Costa Television channel on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD1z6XC8_fqZXP3HayI-kQA.

More information about “Election Preview” in Contra Costa County is available on the Elections Division website at www.cocovote.us and the County’s website at www.contracosta.ca.gov.

 

Filed Under: News, Politics & Elections

Supervisors quietly oppose Prop. 6, but publicly approve report in opposition to the measure on November ballot

September 28, 2018 By Publisher Leave a Comment

Would repeal gas tax increase

By Daniel Borsuk

Listed as a consent item, Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors voted without comment an agenda item aimed to oppose Proposition 6, the Nov. 6 state ballot initiative to repeal Senate Bill 1, otherwise known as the Road Repair and Accountability Act or gas tax, but in public session supervisors voted 3-0 to accept a Public Works Department report describing how passage of Prop. 6 will negatively hit county road projects.

During the meeting on Tuesday, Supervisors had approved their “oppose” position on Proposition 6 without any comment from either the public or the three supervisors in attendance – board chair Karen Mitchoff of Pleasant Hill, supervisor Candace Andersen of San Ramon, and supervisor John Gioia of Richmond – because it was posted as a consent agenda item, C-17.

County Public Works Department Chief Deputy Director Stephen Kowalewski told supervisors that, should Proposition 6 win at the polls, unincorporated Contra Costa County could lose, over the next nine years, $239.9 million or an average of $26.7 million per year.

During that nine-year period Contra Costa County could lose each fiscal year, provided Proposition 6 wins at the polls, $15.5 million in 2018/2019. $21.8 million in 2019/2020, $24.9 million in 2020/2021, $26.4 million in 2021/2022, $27.6 million in 2022/2023, $28.9 million in 2023/2024, $30,3 million 2024/2025, $31.6 million in 2025/2026 and $33.8 million in 2026/2027.

When the State Legislature enacted SB 1 in 2016, the measure raised gas taxes and Department of Motor Vehicle fees to drum up funds for the freeways and roads that were in a rapid state of deterioration.  One of the key features of SB 1 is an index tax provision that permits gas tax revenue to keep pace with inflation.

Kowalewski listed a number of county road projects that could be in jeopardy should Prop. 6 wins in November. Some of those projects include the Kirker Pass Road truck climbing lane, Vasco Road improvements, Byron Road improvements, Baily Road/State Route 4 interchange improvements, Bel Air Trail crossing safety improvements, Blackhawk Road green paint bike lanes, resurfacing of 43 miles of roadway, and the Orwood Road culvert repair that is already in progress.

Supervisors Award $1.5 million Pathologists’ Contract

Supervisors unanimously approved Sheriff-Coroner David O. Livingston’s request to award three two-year contracts totaling $1.5 million to pathologists to perform autopsy services through Sept. 20., 2020.

As a consent item, supervisors approved the sheriff’s bid to award $500,000 contracts each to Dr. Mark A. Super, Dr. Arnold R. Josselson, and to Dr. Ikechi Ogan.  Their contracts will be in effect from Oct. 1, 2018 through Sept. 30, 2020.  Dr. Ogan will serve as coroner.

The three pathologists had provided pathology services to the county sheriff under the entity of Forensic Medical Group, but as of Oct. 1 FMG will no longer provide the county pathologist services because the doctors have decided to dissolve the company.  The three doctors that made up Forensic Medical Group are able to provide services to the county under individual contracts.

There was no comment from either the public or three supervisors in attendance.

Kensington Hills Elementary School School Zone Speed Lowered

Supervisors reduced the school zone speed for three roads approaching Kensington Hilltop Elementary School from 25 miles per hour to 20 MPH over the safety concerns that there are few sidewalks in the area and the roads are narrow.   An engineering and traffic survey were conducted and found that the request by an unnamed applicant complied with Assembly Bill 321 that was passed in 2008.  AB 321 permits local jurisdictions to extend the 25 MPH speed limit in school zones or to lower the speed limit to 15 to 20 MPH up to 500 feet from school grounds under certain circumstances.

The school speed zones will be lowered on approaches 500 feet to Kensington Hilltop Elementary School.  These roads are Highland Boulevard, Arlmont Drive, and Kenyon Avenue.

Cannabis Ordinance Amended

Without any public comment, supervisors amended the county commercial cannabis ordinance on a 3-0 vote.  Supervisors added Knightsen to the list of unincorporated areas where the ordinance will not be enforced.  Along with Knightsen, Bethel Island, Alamo, Acalanes Ridge, Contra Costa Centre, Saranap and Sandamond Slough will also prohibit enforcement of the commercial cannabis ordinance.

Supervisors also amended the ordinance by adding vertically-integrated businesses that include both storefront retail and commercial cultivation.  Vertically-integrated businesses will not count toward the 10-permit limit for commercial cultivation.

The ordinance was also amended to require cannabis delivery businesses located outside of unincorporated Contra Costa County to possess a current County Health Permit.

The ordinance will become effective provided voters pass a tax ordinance measure on the ballot of the Nov. 6 general election.

September 30 Designated Gold Star Mothers’ Day

In recognition of the sacrifice and history of Gold Star Mothers in Contra Costa County and throughout the nation, supervisors approved a resolution designating Sunday, Sept. 30 as Gold Star Mother’s Day, founded during World War I.

Upon thanking the board for the resolution, Gold Star Mother Yolanda Bacon said, “We ask you don’t say ‘You’re sorry for your loss.’  Say instead “Thank you for your son’s or daughter’s service.”

Filed Under: News, Politics & Elections, Supervisors

Supervisors support one, split to stay neutral on another housing measure on Nov. ballot

September 25, 2018 By Publisher Leave a Comment

By Daniel Borsuk

Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors took a “support” position on Proposition 2, a state bond ballot measure to build housing for homeless individuals with mental illness but, took a “no position” on Proposition 10, another state ballot measure that would expand residential property rent control at last Tuesday’s meeting.

Supervisors voted 4-0 in favor of Proposition 2, but voted 3-1 to a remain neutral, with Supervisor John Gioia of Richmond in dissent, on the rent control measure – Proposition 10.  Supervisor Federal Glover of Pittsburg was absent.

Both Proposition 2 and Proposition 10 will appear on the November 6, 2018 general election ballot.

Before the meeting, supervisors were initially prepared to brand an “oppose” position on Proposition 2 that “Authorizes Bonds to Fund Existing Housing Programs for Individuals with Mental Illness Legislative Statute.” But supervisors reversed that recommendation from the board’s Legislation Committee from August 13 to recommend an “oppose” vote on Prop. 2 over concerns the county could lose about $2.8 million in state funds for mental health services.

For a while, Board Chair Karen Mitchoff of Pleasant Hill was concerned passage of Proposition 2 might jeopardize funding for another mental health and housing program for the homeless, the No Place Like Home Program, because a state Legislative Analyst Office report states passage of Proposition 2 would mean money would be borrowed from the 2016 enacted homeless housing program.

During the meeting, Dr. Matthew White, head of the Contra Costa County Behavioral Health Services, said the threat to the state funds, in the event Proposition 2 passes at the polls, will probably have little impact on county mental health services.  He said there is a major need for adequate housing for the homeless needing mental health services that will be integrated into new housing projects.

But some speakers were unconvinced Proposition 2 will not deteriorate county mental health services.

Retired physician Dr. Mark Cohen, who has an adult child with mental illness, urged supervisors to oppose Proposition 2 on grounds that the ballot measure’s passage would divert money away from the psychiatric care services for the severely mentally ill not housed in Proposition 2 funding developments.

County mental health commissioner Douglas Dunn opposes the measure because the county is bound to lose upfront money aimed for mental health services that would be diverted to construct housing for the homeless with mental and substance abuse issues.

In support of Proposition 2, Gloria Bruce, executive director of the East Bay Housing Coalition, said “Proposition 2 is the right way to go. Give high need people access to affordable housing.”

Danville resident Douglas Leach called for supervisors to support Proposition 2 because it would create safe housing for the homeless needing mental health and substance abuse assistance.

Supervisor Diane Burgis of Brentwood said she would support Proposition 2 based on the fact it is “difficult to find housing for the mentally ill,”

“These dollars are needed,” supervisor Candace Andersen of Danville said.  “We won’t see a reduction in programs. It will give us an addition tool.”

On Proposition 10, the Affordable Housing Act, supervisors voted to take “no position” on a 3-1 vote.  Supervisors John Gioia of Richmond cast the dissenting vote.  He supported Proposition 10 mainly because it would eliminate the 1998-enacted Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act that permits landlords to raise rents of residential apartments and houses as much as they want constructed after 1995, but not before 1995.  Costa-Hawkins allows landlords to raise the rent in any building before 1995 to the market value when it becomes vacant.

In other business, supervisors officially adopted the $3.2 billion budget for the 2018-2019 fiscal year without any public comments. The 2018-2019 budget is up from the $3 billion budget for the 2017-2018 fiscal year.

In other action, Supervisors recognized September 16-22 as Falls Prevention Awareness Week at their meeting on Tuesday. At the presentation were Meals on Wheels Mt. Diablo Region Chief Executive Officer Elaine Clark and Communications Specialist Maricel Kinsella.

Meals on Wheels Mt. Diablo Region and the Contra Costa County Fall Prevention Coalition will hold presentations on how to prevent senior citizens from falling in their homes, a leading cause of death or injury to persons 65 years old or more.

Filed Under: Legislation, Politics & Elections, Supervisors

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • …
  • 46
  • Next Page »
Furniture-Clearance-02-26B
Celia's-3-26-A
Delta-RC-A
Deer-Valley-Chiro-06-22

Copyright © 2026 · Contra Costa Herald · Site by Clifton Creative Web