Lasts for three hours
By Daniel Borsuk
In the packed Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors hearing chambers, supervisors and citizens learned a great deal about five candidates in the running for the interim District Attorney post, vacant since the mid-June resignation of Mark Peterson on charges of lying about illegally spending $66,000 from his election campaign fund for personal use.
Before responding to questions pooled from the League of Women Voters of Contra Costa County and emceed by former Contra Costa County Clerk and Register of Voters Steven Weir, supervisors conducted a one hour hearing to allow the public to vent thoughts about the supervisors selection process of the five choices: Contra Costa Superior Court Judge Diana Becton, Contra Costa Superior Court Judge Danielle Douglas, Contra Costa Senior Deputy District Attorney Paul Graves, longtime Contra Costa Deputy District Attorney Tom Kensok, and Santa Clara County Supervising Deputy District Attorney Patrick Vanier, a Contra Costa County resident.
Graves and Vanier have already announced they are running for election in 2018.
During the public hearing, Graves received oral endorsements from eight speakers. One supporter, Laura Dean Swanson described Graves as “Competent and widely respected by people for working for victims’ rights.”
But Richmond City Councilman Melvin Willis cautioned supervisors saying, “We need a district attorney who will look at alternatives other than incarceration. We need new leadership promoting racial justice.”
Nancy Kelly, a retired public defender, urged the supervisors to select an interim DA who would eliminate the bail system, which is racially and financially biased against minorities. Kelly also said the county’s interim DA should be one who picks “juries that reflect the community and not that reflects the upper class or white people.”
During the forum, the five semi-finalists answered a wide variety of questions to shed light regarding their opinions about “restorative justice,” a concept that all the candidates supported.
On the question about the death penalty, the responses varied.
Judge Douglas said she would seek the death penalty for cases meriting it and “would set up a death penalty review panel.” She noted that the cost and racial disparity associated with the death penalty has shown that it has been “abused in this country.”
Vanier said he would use the death penalty for cases that genuinely merit them like the “Ted Bundy” murder case.
Kensok said he, like most Contra Costa voters, voted to abolish the death penalty. “It’s not a deterrent, but I will never say never.” He said there might be murder cases meriting the death penalty.
“The death penalty is not an effective deterrent to crime,” said Judge Beckton.
On prosecuting environmental pollution crimes, candidates’ responses varied, but Kensok seemed to have the best response to that question. “We have an environmental prosecutor,” said Kensok. “We have gone after Chevron. But as DA my priority will be to use our resources to prosecute cases involving violence.”
When asked what his thoughts were about the DA office’s track record on victims’ rights, candidate Vanier said, “Less than one half of the crimes are prosecuted. We need to do a better job of prosecuting crimes that occur in this county.”
On the topic of how to work with at-risk youth, Judge Becton said she would implement a successful program she developed in Richmond, “The Color of Justice.” It teaches school children that African Americans do succeed academically and become lawyers and judges.
As a mother of three daughters, Judge Douglas said she would promote anti-gang awareness programs beginning in the elementary and middle schools. “We need to publicize about the dangers of the Internet and how gangs are able to lure youth at very young age.”
All five candidates said they would not cooperate with United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents.
Supervisors plan to interview finalists for the interim post on September 12; they could announce a selection then or reveal their choice at their September 19 meeting.
Swen Oleson says
At first I thought Kernsock was the weakest candidate of the five. He’s third in command at the Contra Costa ‘s office, but he was close to Mark Peterson, which is kind of a negative in light of Peterson’s inglorious fall from grace He also doesn’t live in the county. But Kensock has performed so well in the forums, I think he now has to be one of the frontrunners. He really knows his stuff. What’s that expression, “You can’t beat brains”, Kensock is a sharp guy. You get the sense he could step right into the DA’s job, no learning curve at all. One thing I learned about Kensock is he’s on a local board, he’s already an elected official. So he knows budgets – a critical part of the DA’s job. Given Kensock’s performance at the debate-forums I do think the Board of Supervisors should strongly consider him for the appointment. If the board is focused on a candidate they believe has the experience to run the office – proven experience – then Kensock maybe should get the nod. Finally, I think he has made the case Peterson’s problems should not reflect on him.
Gina Channell says
Here is an another article that you can read as part of my application for the community reporter position.