Contra Costa Herald

A suspect is arrested in the Bay Area after attempting to steal multiple items and Organized Retail Crime Blitz statistics. Photos & source: CHP

By Jaime Coffee, Director of Communications Office of Media Relations, CHP

SACRAMENTO — The California Highway Patrol (CHP) continues to make steady progress in dismantling organized retail crime networks throughout the state. Recently, the CHP joined more than 100 law enforcement agencies for a National Organized Retail Crime Blitz, helping recover $1.05 million in stolen goods. Building on last year’s success, this event reaffirms the CHP’s commitment to holding retail theft suspects accountable.

From August 1 through 9, the CHP Organized Retail Crime Task Force (ORCTF) saturated communities and led coordinated enforcement operations at several businesses, shopping centers and retail stores statewide. Officers proactively identified and apprehended offenders suspected of organized retail theft.

“The impacts of retail theft on businesses and communities are long-lasting. The CHP will continue to dedicate resources to catching perpetrators and holding accountable those who take from businesses and victimize communities.” – CHP Commissioner Sean Duryee

As a result of the CHP’s statewide efforts, officers arrested 97 suspects, including eight on felony charges, and recovered more than 8,500 stolen items valued at approximately $1.05 million.

“The proactive operations conducted during the blitz are a snapshot of the work the Organized Retail Crime Task Force is committed to doing every day,” added Commissioner Duryee. “We will continue to do our part year-round to identify problematic areas, reduce retail theft and make California a safer place to work, live and visit.”

Numerous stolen sneakers recovered during coordinated enforcement efforts in San Diego. A suspect is arrested by the CHP Border Division during the ORC Blitz.

Yearly Progress Snapshot

Looking at the broader picture, the blitz builds on years of steady enforcement. Since the ORCTF’s inception in 2019, the CHP has been involved in more than 4,700 investigations, resulting in more than 5,300 arrests and the recovery of more than 1.6 million stolen items valued at more than $76.6 million as of July 30.

In the first seven months of 2026, the CHP made nearly 350 retail theft arrests, investigated more than 280 incidents, and assisted partner agencies with more than 80 investigations, recovering an estimated $6.7 million in stolen goods.

Organized retail crime affects more than businesses. It can impact employees, consumers and the communities where these businesses operate. The CHP will continue to work with its law enforcement partners to disrupt organized retail crime and protect California’s communities.

Officers arrest a retail theft suspect during a series of proactive blitz operations in Roseville, Lodi and Stockton.

Organized Retail Theft Program

In response to AB 1065, the CHP, in consultation with the DOJ, developed a task force concept to work with allied agencies to combat organized retail theft. The CHP encourages victims of organized retail crime to use the tip link resource located on this page to report qualifying incident(s)

Beginning in 2019, Assembly Bill (AB) 1065 required the Department of the California Highway Patrol (CHP), until July 1, 2021, to coordinate with the Department of Justice (DOJ) to convene a regional property crimes task force to identify geographic areas experiencing increased levels of property crimes and assist local law enforcement with resources, such as personnel and equipment.  The recent passage of Assembly Bill 331 will extend the operation of the regional property crimes task force until January 1, 2026.

As reported by the National Retail Federation, organized retail theft accounts for nearly $30 billion in economic loss per year.  This loss is carried by retailers on several levels but is ultimately passed on to consumers through price inflation to offset economic loss.  While the problem is most commonly associated with shoplifting, it extends well beyond into associated organized criminal activity.  Commercial burglary, vehicle burglary, identity theft, credit card fraud, forgery, and fencing (selling or distribution of) stolen property are part of a bigger picture that finance ongoing criminal operations.

A trunk full of stolen items was recovered and multiple stolen items recovered from a Target as a result of proactive operations throughout Bakersfield and Turlock.

In response to AB 1065, the CHP, in consultation with the DOJ, developed a task force concept to work with allied agencies to combat organized retail theft.  Three regional task forces, known as Organized Retail Crime Task Forces (ORCTF), were established by the CHP in five field Divisions with the greatest need for immediate action:  Golden Gate Division (encompassing the greater Bay Area), Southern Division (encompassing the greater Los Angeles region), Border Division (encompassing Orange and San Diego counties), Valley Division (encompassing the greater Sacramento area and surrounding counties), and Central Division (encompassing the San Joaquin Valley).

The CHP encourages victims of organized retail crime to report qualifying incident(s) which are covered under California Penal Code Section 490.4, Organized Retail Theft.

Click here to report organized retail theft

Click here for more information on the CHP’s Organized Retail Theft Program.

The mission of the CHP is to provide the highest level of Safety, Service and Security.

New Pittsburg Police Department Captain Will Hatcher, Lieutenant Cory Smith and Sergeant Jerry Sanchez. Photos: Pittsburg PD

By Toni Baldazo, City of Pittsburg Community Engagement Officer

This week was an exciting week for the Pittsburg Police Department as Chief Phil Galer held an oath of office ceremony recognizing three well-deserved promotions. Please join us in congratulating Captain Will Hatcher, Lieutenant Cory Smith and Sergeant Jerry Sanchez, Jr.

Captain Will Hatcher

Captain William Hatcher began his career with the Pittsburg Police Department more than two decades ago. He was promoted to Sergeant in 2013 and served several key leadership assignments, including SWAT Team Leader and supervisor of the Street Team, Narcotics Unit, and Investigations Division. In 2021, he was promoted to Lieutenant, serving as a Watch Commander, SWAT Commander, and overseeing both the Administrative Services and Investigations divisions.

Captain Hatcher is a graduate of the Sherman Block Leadership Institute and California POST Command College and holds two master’s degrees in criminal justice and public safety leadership. In January 2027, he will represent the Pittsburg Police Department at the FBI National Academy.

Throughout his career, Captain Hatcher has remained committed to serving the Pittsburg community and the men and women of the Department. As he begins his new role as Captain, he looks forward to continuing to lead with integrity, developing, and investing in others, and contributing to the Department’s continued progress and a safer, stronger Pittsburg.

Pittsburg Police Chief Phil Galer administers the oath of office to the three department leaders on Monday, Aug. 17, 2026. Photo: Pittsburg PD

Lieutenant Cory Smith

Cory Smith began his career in public service nearly 25 years ago, serving four years on active duty with the United States Air Force, including overseas deployments in support of combat operations. Following his military service, Cory pursued a career in law enforcement and was sworn in as a Pittsburg Police Officer in 2006.

During his 20 years with the Pittsburg Police Department, Cory has served numerous specialized assignments, including Field Training Officer, Honor Guard member, Perimeter Response Team member, Tactical Medic, SWAT Operator, and Motor Officer. In 2021, Cory promoted to Sergeant, serving as a Patrol Supervisor, SWAT Team Leader, and supervisor of the Special Investigations Unit. He later joined Professional Standards as the Hiring and Training Sergeant, FTO Coordinator, and Department Training Coordinator, where he focused on developing personnel, strengthening recruitment and training, and improving Department operations.

Throughout his career, Cory has remained committed to developing others, strengthening the Pittsburg Police Department, and serving the community. As he promotes to Lieutenant, he looks forward to continuing that commitment and leading with the values that have guided him throughout his career: trust, accountability, and investing in people.

Pittsburg Police Chief Phil Galer (send from left) is joined by newly promoted department leaders, Sgt. Jerry Sanchez, Lt. Cory Smith and Captain Will Hatcher after being sworn in. Photo: Pittsburg PD

Sergeant Jerry Sanchez

Jerry Sanchez joined the Pittsburg Police Department in August 2021, bringing eight years of law enforcement experience and a strong personal connection to the Pittsburg community. Since joining the Department, Jerry has served as a Field Training Officer, Traffic Officer, Fatal Collision Investigator, SWAT Team member, and Marine Patrol Team member.

Prior to joining Pittsburg PD, Jerry began his law enforcement career with the Oakland Police Department in 2013. During this time, Jerry served as a Motor Officer, EVOC instructor, Patrol Rifle Officer, Field Training Officer, Traffic Investigator, and SWAT Team member.

Jerry has twice been elected President of the Pittsburg Police Officers’ Association, reflecting the trust and confidence of his peers. As he promotes to Sergeant, Jerry looks forward to using his experience to mentor and develop officers, support those he leads, and continue commitment of service to the Pittsburg community.

A post on the Department’s Facebook page on Monday, Aug. 17th reads, “Today was a proud day for the Pittsburg Police Department as Chief Phil Galer held a promotional swearing-in ceremony recognizing three well-deserved promotions. Each of these leaders has demonstrated dedication, professionalism, and a commitment to serving our Department and the Pittsburg community. Congratulations on your well-earned promotions! We look forward to your continued leadership and service to our Pittsburg community!

The Pittsburg Police Department has no greater honor than to keep our citizens safe and to serve our community. We pledge to continue our partnership with the community, build valued relationships based on mutual respect and open dialog through professionalism, excellence and trust. For more information visit Police Department | City of Pittsburg.

Completed project improvements at Temescal Regional Park in Oakland include renovated fishing piers, upgraded erosion protection, improved accessible parking and restrooms, and a new accessible picnic area. The project was completed by East Bay Regional Park District with support from LWCF funds. Photos: CA State Parks

Application deadline: Jan. 14, 2027

What you need to know: Eligible public agencies can apply for up to $6 million per project through a federal grant program aimed at expanding access to outdoor spaces and recreational opportunities.

By California Dep’t of Parks & Recreation, Divisions of Boating and Waterways, Historic Preservation and Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation

SACRAMENTO — California State Parks is inviting eligible public entities across California to apply for funding through the federal Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) program, which is offering approximately $27.5 million in grants. The program helps agencies acquire land and develop parks and recreational amenities that support the health and wellness of communities. Applications are due by Jan. 14, 2027.

“Access to parks and outdoor recreation helps Californians live healthier, happier lives,” said California State Parks Director Armando Quintero. “Grants such as the Land and Water Conservation Fund empower communities to invest in outdoor spaces that will provide these benefits for generations to come. We encourage all eligible applicants across the state to take advantage of this opportunity to help create more open spaces in their communities.”

This funding opportunity aligns with the Newsom Administration’s Outdoors for All Initiative, which aims to expand access to Californians’ great outdoors.

Key Details

• Grant Purpose:Supports projects to acquire or develop parks prioritizing recreational opportunities.
• Deadline: 14, 2027, before midnight.
• Grant Amount: Around $27.5 million in total available statewide; up to $6 million can be requested per application.
• Criteria: Eligible applicants include cities and counties, federally recognized Native American Tribes, Joint Powers Authorities, park districts, and special districts with the authority to acquire, operate, and maintain public park and recreation areas.
• Application Process: Applicants must first submit an online application to California State Parks by the above due date and time. State Parks will review the applications and forward selected projects to the National Park Service for final review and approval.
• Application Guide Review: California State Parks will host virtual and in-person workshops to review the LWCF Application Guide meant to help applicants prepare their application. Visit the State Parks Land and Water Conservation Fund webpage for workshop dates, times and locations, and registration information.

If you have specific questions about a potential project, please contact your county’s assigned National Park Service Grants Project Officer.

About Land and Water Conservation Fund

Under the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1964, the funding helps safeguard the nation’s natural areas, water resources, and cultural heritage. The Act intends to provide all Americans with recreation opportunities by developing public outdoor recreation areas and facilities. Since its inception in 1965, the LWCF program in California has funded more than 1,600 projects totaling $395 million. View recent projects here: Parks for All Californians: Projects Gallery and Map.

About the Office of Grants and Local Services

California State Parks’ Office of Grants and Local Services (OGALS) develops grant programs to fund projects for local, state and nonprofit organizations. Since 1964, nearly 8,000 community parks throughout California have been created or improved with OGALS grant funding investments. Since 2000, this state program has administered approximately $4.4 billion in grant funding across the state.

The California Department of Parks and Recreation, popularly known as State Parks, and the programs supported by its Office of Historic Preservation and divisions of Boating and Waterways and Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation provide for the health, inspiration and education of the people of California by helping to preserve the state’s extraordinary biological diversity, protecting its most valued natural and cultural resources, and creating opportunities for high-quality outdoor recreation. Learn more at parks.ca.gov.

Background graphic: Transparent CA

State’s largest free database of public employee pay and pension information

New website is live – faster, mobile friendly and 100% ad free, giving 10 million users a clearer look at government pay and spending.

By Transparent California Staff

Transparent California, the state’s largest database of public pay and pension data, has now obtained 2024 data covering over 93% of employee compensation and pension payments in our state. This includes state, county, city, school district, and special records. Our team has collected almost 3 million compensation records documenting $278 billion in total pay and benefits, and 1.5 million pension records with $64 billion in payments. Since launching over a decade ago Transparent California has now collected and posted over 50 million compensation and pension records. All available free at http://transparentcalifornia.com.

This year we’ve made that site easier to use. Users report they love our site changes and web traffic has seen a tremendous increase, to over 2 million page views a month.

Did you know in 2024 149,065 public employees made total compensation exceeding a quarter-million dollars a year? For more detail on what we’ve found in this data, go to our website and click on News and Updates for a summary.

And if you have a specific interest in an agency of our government, click “Get notified” on that agency’s page and you’ll get a notice when new data is posted.

Transparent California’s data collection schedule is determined by the State Controller’s Office reporting requirements. The inordinate delays allowed by the state, as well as significant resistance from some of the agencies involved, is why we’re just now wrapping up 2024.

Assembly Bill AB1821, if passed, would extend the time for a response from 14 calendar days to 14 “business days”, effectively be three weeks. This may sound small, but that deadline only applies to a “response”, not to provision of the actual records requested. Our legislature continues to ignore the current legislation has no defined deadline for production of the actual records, nor does it impose any penalty on agencies for delaying the process (or declining to respond altogether) even if the requester files a lawsuit and wins.

Transparent California’s Director of Research, Todd Maddison, notes “As we see more tax increase proposals appearing, we’re focused on giving the People the data they deserve to see how their existing tax dollars are being spent, so they can make informed decisions at the ballot box.”

Photo: Transparent CA

On July 10, the organization announced its new website.

A faster, ad free tool that makes government salaries and spending easier to find, and harder to hide.

Ten million people a year visit Transparent California to look up a city salary, a pension payout, or an overtime number that doesn’t add up. For a decade, that’s been the only way for regular taxpayers to see where their money actually goes.

The old site made that harder than it needed to be. It was cluttered with ads, slow to load, and difficult to use on a phone. Worse, the public records it published were often months out of date by the time they reached the public. That delay served the bureaucrats who’d rather keep taxpayers in the dark. It didn’t serve anyone else.

What’s New

Transparent California just relaunched with a complete redesign, and the improvements go far beyond a new coat of paint.

The new site is ad free, for now, thanks to generous donors who believe taxpayers shouldn’t have to dig through banner ads and pop ups just to see how their money is spent. That means no clutter standing between users and the data. It’s also built for mobile, so anyone can search a government employee’s salary or an agency’s budget from their phone in seconds. And the records themselves now publish faster, cutting down the months long lag that used to separate a public record from the public.

The result is a search tool that actually works the way taxpayers need it to: quick, clean, and current.

Why It Matters

Government salary and pension data has always been public information. The problem was never access on paper, it was access in practice. Burying records in a slow, ad choked, outdated system is its own kind of opacity.

A faster, cleaner Transparent California means a reporter can find a story in minutes instead of hours. It means a parent, a small business owner, or a retiree checking on their local government doesn’t need special skills to find what they’re looking for. Good government starts with the public actually being able to see what government is doing, and this update closes a gap that had been open for years.

A Decade of Results, Backed by Nevadans and Californians

Transparent California isn’t new. For twelve years, its salary and pension data have been cited by major news outlets across California and the United States to expose government waste. That reporting has helped identify hundreds of millions of dollars in questionable spending, money that taxpayers have a right to know about.

The project has never taken a dollar of government funding. It’s funded entirely by people who believe the public has a right to see how public money is spent, which is exactly why it answers only to the truth, not to any agency it covers.

What’s Next

The redesigned platform isn’t just built for California. It’s built as a modular blueprint that can expand to other states, creating a wider network of public salary and spending data that taxpayers everywhere can use.

Take a look at the new Transparent California and see what ten million users already know: when government spending is easy to find, it’s a lot harder to hide.

Explore the new Transparent California website

Keep It Ad Free

The ad free experience only lasts as long as donors keep funding it. Every gift helps cover the cost of running the platform without selling space to advertisers, so the site stays focused entirely on public accountability, not corporate banners.

Transparent California depends on the generosity of individual donors to enable this collection. Anyone with a specific interest in a particular agency can sponsor collection of their data and support the effort to provide the public with this service.

Allen D. Payton contributed to this report.

New Contra Costa County Assistant Sheriff Charlene Jacquez. Photo: CCC Sheriff’s Office

East County native will oversee Administrative Services Bureau

By Jimmy Lee, Director of Public Affairs, Contra Costa County Office of the Sheriff

Contra Costa County Sheriff David Livingston announces the promotion of Captain Charlene Jacquez to the rank of Assistant Sheriff.

Captain Charlene Jacquez began her public safety career in 1999 with the City of Galt Police Department, serving as both a 9-1-1 Dispatcher and Community Service Officer (CSO). In 2001, she joined the Brentwood Police Department as a CSO, a position she held for five years. While working full time, she attended the police academy graduating in 2005.

In 2006, Captain Jacquez began her career with the Contra Costa Sheriff’s Office as a Deputy Sheriff in the Custody Services Bureau where she worked in detention facilities, served as a Jail Training Officer, and worked in the Classification Unit. Captain Jacquez later transferred to the Field Operations Bureau where her assignments included county patrol, contract City of Oakley, and Detective in Investigations where she handled domestic violence, sexual as-sault, and homicide cases.

Captain Jacquez was promoted to the rank of Sergeant in 2019, serving at the Martinez Deten-tion Facility and later in the contract City of Lafayette. In 2022, she was promoted to Lieutenant and assigned as the Station House Commander of Delta Station. In February last year, she was promoted to the rank of Captain and assigned as the West County Detention Division Commander, which includes the Marsh Creek Detention Facility.

Captain Jacquez served on the SWAT Hostage Negotiations Team and as Commander of the County’s Mutual Aid Mobile Field Force (MAMFF) Team. She is a graduate of POST Command College, Class 75, and holds a Bachelor of Science in Criminal Justice and a Master of Arts in Organizational Leadership.

“I am pleased to promote Captain Charlene Jacquez to the rank of Assistant Sheriff,” said Sheriff David Livingston. “Captain Jacquez has been dedicated and committed to the agency and serving Contra Costa County residents. I am proud of her accomplishments and throughout her career she has shown leadership and is well-positioned to guide the Sheriff’s Office and staff into the future.”

As Assistant Sheriff, Jacquez will oversee the Administrative Services Bureau which includes Personnel & Finance, Professional Standards, Recruiting, and Training.

“I am honored and humbled by the opportunity to serve as Assistant Sheriff,” said Captain Jacquez. “Having been born and raised in East Contra Costa County, I have a deep connection to this community and am committed to continuing to serve our residents while supporting the men and women of the Office of the Sheriff.”

Hikers explore Strathearn Ranch Natural Reserve in the Diablo Range. Photo: Scott Hein. Source: Save Mount Diablo

By Laura Kindsvater, Senior Communications Manager, Save Mount Diablo

SACRAMENTO, CA—On August 13, the California legislature did something historic when they recognized and approved the Diablo Range as an official California conservation priority deemed critical to helping the state meet its 30×30 initiative to address the climate crisis.

A California condor soars over Pinnacles National Park in the Diablo Range. Photo: Scott Hein. Source: Save Mount Diablo

Last year, Save Mount Diablo sponsored an Assembly Concurrent Resolution (ACR), authored by Assemblymember Rebecca Bauer-Kahan, officially recognizing the Diablo Range as a California conservation priority.

Assembly Concurrent Resolution, ACR 107, was reviewed and approved by the Assembly Committee on Water, Parks, and Wildlife on September 10, 2025, after we provided testimony to the committee addressing the need for the resolution.

Our Diablo Range resolution then went before the Assembly, where it was reviewed and approved on September 13, 2025.

On June 9, 2026, we provided testimony in support of ACR 107 to the Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee, and thereafter they approved our Diablo Range resolution.

Then on August 13, 2026, the Senate approved ACR 107 unanimously (33-0). With that final approval, our Diablo Range resolution was adopted, thereby officially recognizing the Diablo Range as a California conservation priority critical to helping the state meet its 30×30 initiative.

Introducing the resolution to the Senate floor for a vote, Senator John Laird remarked, “On behalf of Assemblymember Bauer-Kahan, I rise with alacrity to present ACR 107 . . . which recognizes the importance of the Diablo Range, one of California’s most significant overlooked natural landscapes. This covers 4 million acres, 12 counties, some of which I represent. It was a trivia question at the Senate Democratic Caucus, and not many people knew where the Diablo Range was. Now they do, because this resolution celebrates the ecological, historical, and economic significance of the Diablo Range and encourages continued stewardship of the landscape.”

Tule elk in the San Antonio Valley, part of the Diablo Range. Photo: Sean Burke. Source: Save Mount Diablo

The Diablo Range is over 200 miles long, contains more than 4 million acres that are largely intact and undeveloped, and is less than 30 percent conserved. And this mountain range runs through 12 counties, with Mount Diablo in its northernmost county of Contra Costa.

The Diablo Range is an immense and important wildlife habitat corridor, teeming with biodiversity. It is home to hundreds of rare and endangered species, such as the California condor and blunt-nosed leopard lizard.

More than 10 million people reside in communities immediately surrounding the Diablo Range, so protecting more lands and creating more parks within the range has been identified as a fantastic way to help more people get access to nature.

The Diablo Range provides California with one of its best opportunities to meet multiple goals in its 30×30 initiative set up to help the state address the climate crisis.

California’s 30×30 initiative aims to conserve 30 percent of the state’s lands and coastal waters by 2030, promoting biodiversity, climate resilience, and access to nature.

California Assemblymember Rebecca Bauer-Kahan (center) is joined by (L-R) Save Mount Diablo Board member Jim Felton, Board President Robert Phelps, Executive Director Ted Clement and Board member Phil O’Loane. Photo: Dylan Finley. Source: Save Mount Diablo

We thank Assemblymember Rebecca Bauer-Kahan; Senator John Laird, who gave ACR 107 a great introduction on the floor of the Senate before the Senate vote; and the rest of the California legislature that approved our Diablo Range resolution.

We also give thanks to our Save Mount Diablo team who worked hard on this historic effort, including a small group of staff, Board members, and leadership donors to our Diablo Range Campaign.

Further, we thank our legislative advocate, Douglas D. Houston, and his team at Houston Magnani and Associates who assisted us throughout this process. Finally, we thank all our partner organizations, agencies, and supporters who sent ACR 107 support letters to the legislature.

The California legislature’s historic approval of our resolution has just given much needed visibility, attention, and momentum to protecting the previously little-known, yet hugely important, Diablo Range.

Left graphic source: CABAT

Says “the District Board wrote the RTM Ballot Question…in a way that is intentionally confusing or misleading to voters.”

By Allen D. Payton

The Committee for Affordable Bay Area Transit (CABAT) organized to oppose the Regional Transit Measure (RTM) on the November ballot filed a lawsuit, Monday, against Election Officials in the five included counties and Kimberly Ward, the Public Transit Revenue Measure District Elections Official. If approved by voters, the tax measure, known as Connect Bay Area Transit, will raise a half-cent in four of the five counties, including Contra Costa, Alameda, Santa Clara and San Mateo and one-cent in San Francisco County for 14 years and raise an estimated $17 billion.

Labeled a VERIFIED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, the lawsuit was filed in Santa Clara County Superior Court by 10 petitioners including former State Senator Quentin L. Kopp, Gregg A. Diéguez, President of CABAT and Director of Sustainability for SHIFT Bay Area, and Marc Joffe, President of the Contra Costa Taxpayers Association, as well as Brian Holtz, Thomas Rubin and five others listed as individuals and electors in the Public Transit Revenue Measure District.

Kopp is also President of the San Francisco Taxpayers Association; Holtz is President of the Purissima Hills Water District Board of Directors in Santa Clara County and Secretary and Treasurer of the Libertarian Party of Santa Clara County; and Rubin is Vice President of the Alameda County Taxpayers Association, Inc.

Attorney Jason Bezis of Lafayette is representing them.

The District was formed to oversee the process for the transit tax measure. (See related article) According to the Fact Sheet for SB 63: Connect Bay Area Act, a separate oversight committee will be formed “to confirm money distribution follows the SB 63 expenditure plan” should the measure pass.

The lawsuit was filed before “the final printing deadline date” of “Friday, August 28, 2026, by which all ballot language and County Voter Information Guides (CVIG) materials must be finalized, including resolving any legal challenges in court.”

Transit Officials Were Warned But Did It Anyway

According to Joffe, “Transit officials cannot claim they were blindsided. On the night of July 23, 2026, the eve of the board’s special meeting, attorney Bezis sent a detailed pre-litigation demand letter urging the board not to approve the question as drafted.  The letter was acknowledged multiple times and the measure was placed on the ballot with the slanted wording anyway.”

Lawsuit cover page. Source: CABAT

Legal Claims

The lawsuit “challenges biased, not neutral, untrue, partial, argumentative, and/or prejudicial wording in the RTM Ballot Question (also called ‘ballot label’ or ‘statement of the measure’) in violation of the Elections Code sections 9051(e) and 13119(c) standards and false and/or misleading wording in the RTM Ballot Question under the Elections Code section 9380/McDonough v. Superior Court (2012) 204 Cal.App.4th 1169 (‘McDonough’) standard. This lawsuit also challenges the Impartial Analysis authored by real party in interest DISTRICT Counsel KATHLEEN KANE as false, misleading, and/or not impartial in violation of Elections Code section 9380.”

The petitioners “seek a writ of mandate to compel amendment of the ballot question (also known as ‘ballot label’ or ‘statement of the measure’) and the impartial analysis that Respondents COUNTY ELECTIONS OFFICIALS and Ms. WARD are preparing for voter use in the Regional Transit Measure (‘RTM’) election to be held on November 3, 2026.”

Further, the lawsuit claims, “Petitioners assert that the DISTRICT and DISTRICT BOARD wrote the RTM Ballot Question…in a way that is intentionally confusing or misleading to voters.”

Current Ballot Language

The lawsuit explains, “As approved by the PTRMD BOARD at its July 24, 2026 meeting, the RTM Ballot Question (see District Resolution No. 2 Page 7) currently reads:

‘To prevent major service cuts to BART and other transit, avoid increased traffic, and reduce pollution by: Preserving BART, Caltrain, VTA, SamTrans, AC Transit, Muni, other transit for everyone, including workers, students, seniors, persons with disabilities; Supporting transit safety, cleanliness, affordability, reliability; Repairing targeted roads/potholes; Requiring financial transparency, oversight, accountability; shall the measure enacting a 0.5% (Alameda, Contra Costa, San Mateo, Santa Clara counties), and 1% (San Francisco) sales tax for 14 years generating approximately $980,000,000 annually, be adopted?’”

Challenges & Proposed Changes

However, the petitioners claim the adopted ballot language does not comply with state Elections Code and the amount is incorrect and should instead be $1.2 million per year. They claim the statement of the measure is not “a true and impartial synopsis of the purpose of the proposed measure,” is “argumentative” and “likely to create prejudice for or against the measure,” and that the “RTM Ballot question is inherently prejudicial” based on a survey MTC conducted last year. Furthermore, the petitioners “argue that components of the RTM Ballot Question are false and/or misleading.”

They want to make the following changes:

• Amend the phrase “Preserving BART …” to read “Funding BART …”
• Delete the phrase “for everyone, including workers, students, seniors, persons with disabilities”.
• Delete the phrase “To prevent major service cuts to BART and other transit”.
• Alternatively, strike the word “major” in the phrase “To prevent major service cuts …”
• Delete the phrase “avoid increased traffic”.
• Delete the phrase “reduce pollution”.
• Strike the phrase “/potholes”.
• Amend “Repairing targeted roads” to read “Repaving transit-served roads”.
• Strike the words “affordability, reliability”.
• Amend “enacting” to read “imposing”.
• Amend the phrase “sales tax” to read “sales and use tax”.
• Strike the word “oversight” in the phrase “Requiring … oversight”.
• Strike the word “accountability” in the phrase “Requiring … accountability”.
• Amend “$980,000,000 annually” (September 2025 estimate) to an updated number (an August 2026 estimate) or “$1,200,000,000 annually” (September 2025 estimates, averaged over 14 years).

Alternative Ballot Language

The lawsuit offers the following ballot language alternatives:

“If the Court were to order all of the amendments and corrections suggested by Petitioners supra, the RTM Ballot Question would read:

‘Funding BART, Caltrain, VTA, SamTrans, AC Transit, Muni, other transit; Supporting transit safety, cleanliness; Repaving transit-serving roads; Requiring financial transparency; shall the measure imposing a 0.5% (Alameda, Contra Costa, San Mateo, Santa Clara counties) and 1% (San Francisco) sales and use tax for 14 years generating approximately $1,200,000,000 annually, be adopted?’”

The lawsuit further reads, “If the Court were to order all of the amendments and corrections suggested by Petitioners supra, including use of the ‘Shall the measure … be adopted?’ format, the RTM Ballot Question would read:

‘Shall the measure imposing a 0.5% (Alameda, Contra Costa, San Mateo, Santa Clara counties) and 1% (San Francisco) sales and use tax for 14 years generating approximately $1,200,000,000 annually; Funding BART, Caltrain, VTA, SamTrans, AC Transit, Muni, other transit; Supporting transit safety, cleanliness; Repaving transit-serving roads; Requiring financial transparency; be adopted?’”

The petitioners also claim the “RTM Impartial Analysis is partial, false, and/or misleading” and that it should be written by either the California Attorney General, a county counsel or district attorney instead of Kathleen Kane who is he legal counsel for the District.

“Supporters of the Transit Measure need to use misleading advertising because voters won’t pass the measure if they have the real story that it is a regressive tax falling hardest on seniors and low-income families for 14 years,” Dieguez stated.

“Voters deserve the honest description the law guarantees them, and if the district won’t provide it, a court should,” Joffe added.

See the Public Transit Revenue Measure District’s Legal Counsel RTM Impartial Analysis.

See RTM Ballot Question Lawsuit Aug 17

For more information about CABAT visit Committee for Affordable Bay Area Transit.

The election is Tuesday, Nov. 3.

Source: CDTFA

Share ideas, raise concerns, provide suggestions online or in person

By David Hafner, Office of Public Affairs, CDTFA

What: The Taxpayers’ Bill of Rights Meeting, on August 19, 2026, is an opportunity for taxpayers to provide valuable feedback on the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration’s (CDTFA) programs and procedures. Presided over by the Department’s Taxpayers’ Rights Advocate, Alfred Buck, the annual meeting encourages taxpayers to share ideas, raise concerns and provide suggestions. This meeting is open to everyone.

DATE: Wednesday, August 19, 2026

TIME:  9:30 a.m.

ONLINE: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/tra/tbor-meetings.htm

IN PERSON: May Lee State Office Complex Auditorium, 651 Bannon Street, Sacramento, CA 95811-0299
Those unable to attend in person can also participate by:

• Telephone, toll-free at 844-767-5651, access code 8014689.

• Viewing the livestream (link will be posted at www.cdtfa.ca.gov/tra/tbor-meetings.htm prior to the meeting).

• Submitting comments by email.

To learn more about the rights provided under the Taxpayers’ Bill of Rights, visit CDTFA’s Taxpayers’ Rights Advocate (TRA) website or contact the TRA Office at taxpayer.rights@cdtfa.ca.gov or +1.888.324.2798. You can also view the TRA’s  2024/25 Annual Report.

About the Taxpayers’ Bill of Rights

Enacted in January 1989, the Harris-Katz California Taxpayers’ Bill of Rights ensures that the rights of California taxpayers are protected during the assessment and collection of sales taxes. The Taxpayers’ Bill of Rights was expanded in 1993 to include special tax programs such as environmental fees, fuel taxes, and tobacco taxes.

According to the California Franchise Tax Board, “As a California taxpayer, your rights are protected. The California Taxpayers’ Bill of Rights requires us to adequately protect the rights, privacy, and property of all California taxpayers when we assess or collect tax.

“Your rights include:

• Privacy and confidentiality: The privacy of your tax information.
• Professional and courteous service: Our employees should treat taxpayers courteously and complete tasks (such as audits) within a reasonable amount of time.
• Representation: You may represent yourself, or with proper authorization, have someone else represent you.
• Pay no more than the correct amount you owe: You should promptly pay the full amount of taxes that you owe. In general, we do not take collection action on an amount you owe until after we give you an opportunity to pay.
• Protests, appeals, and judicial review: You have protest and appeal rights as a taxpayer. If you disagree with a decision, you have the right to file a protest with us. If you disagree with FTB’s determination of your protest, you have the right to appeal your case to the Office of Tax Appeals.

For more information:

• California Taxpayers’ Bill of Rights (FTB 4058) – This publication provides an overview of your rights and includes the major provisions of California legislation.
• California Taxpayers’ Bill of Rights – An Overview (FTB 4058C) – Describes the Revenue and Taxation Code (R&TC) provisions of your rights.”

The California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA) administers California’s sales and use, fuel, tobacco, alcohol and cannabis taxes, as well as other taxes and fees that fund specific state programs. CDTFA-administered programs accounted for more than $97.8 billion in the 2024/25 fiscal year, supporting essential local services such as transportation, public safety and health, libraries, schools, social services and natural resource management programs through the distribution of tax dollars directly to local communities.

Photo, agency & map graphics: MTC

To oversee process for Bay Area transit tax on Nov. ballot

By Metropolitan Transportation Commission

OAKLAND, CA – Updated Aug. 17, 2026 – The Public Transit Revenue Measure District (PTRMD) was established under Government Code Title 7.85, by Senate Bill 63 (2025), which also authorizes a regional transportation revenue measure to be placed on the November 2026 ballot, known as the Connect Bay Area Transit Initiative.

District Members

The Public Transit Revenue Measure District is comprised of the same individuals that govern the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC).

The PTRMD on Jan. 16, 2026, received a notice of intent from the Connect Bay Area Transit Committee to place a citizen’s initiative on the November 2026 ballot. Senate Bill 63, authored by state senators Scott Wiener of San Francisco and Jesse Arreguín of Berkeley, authorized a qualified voter initiative to impose a retail transactions and use tax ordinance applicable to the entire district for a duration of 14 years, in an amount of 0.5% in each of the counties located within the district and 1% in the City and County of San Francisco, subject to voter approval at the November 3, 2026, statewide general election.

On July 1, 2026, the District Elections Official issued a Certificate to Initiative Petition, certifying that proponents of the Connect Bay Area Transit Initiative submitted sufficient valid signatures for the measure to qualify for placement on the ballot.

The District at its July 24, 2026, meeting formally approved a resolution accepting the District Elections Official’s certification of the Connect Bay Area Transit initiative measure and requesting the Boards of Supervisors in Alameda, Contra Costa, San Francisco, San Mateo and Santa Clara counties to call a special election on the measure and to consolidate this special election with the November 3, 2026, statewide general election.

Impartial Analysis of Regional Transit Measure 

Legal counsel for the Public Transit Revenue Measure District has prepared an impartial analysis of the  Regional Transit Measure pursuant to subdivision (d) of Government Code 67740. This text will also be included in each county’s voter information guide per state law.

Notices of Election Provided by Santa Clara County

Santa Clara County Registrar of Voters provided the following notices of election:

• Notice of General Election
• 大選通告
• AVISO DE ELECCIÓN GENERAL
• THÔNG BÁO TỔNG TUYỂN CỬ
• Paunawa Sa Pangkalahatang Halalan

Election-Related Deadlines 

Established election dates related to the measure can be found on the Santa Clara County Registrar of Voters (ROV) website. Please reference the most recently published Public Transit Revenue Measure District (PTRMD) calendars, which may be accessed at the SantaClaraCounty.gov website.  If you are unable to access the link, please contact the Santa Clara County ROV directly for assistance.

Staff Contact

Kimberly Ward, District Elections Official
Phone: 415-778-5367
Email: kward@bayareametro.gov

請求協助! | ¡Solicita ayuda! | Request assistance! 

您是否需要我們翻譯其中一份文件的內容? 您是否需要大字體或盲文印刷的書面資料? 您是否需要手語或您所說語言的口譯服務才能參與?

如需協助，請致電 (415) 778-6757。若需使用 TDD 或為聽障人士，請致電 711，加州轉接服務，或 (800) 735-2929 (TTY) ，(800) 735-2922 (語音)，然後要求轉接至(415) 778-6700。請至少提前三個工作日提出申請，以便我們能為您提供適當的安排。

¿Necesita que alguno de nuestros documentos sea traducido? ¿Necesita nuestras comunicaciones escritas en letra grande o en Braille? ¿Necesita un intérprete del lenguaje de señas o un intérprete que hable su idioma para poder participar?

Para solicitar asistencia, por favor llamemos al (415) 778-6757. Para telecomunicaciones para personas sordas y discapacitadas, favor de llamar al 711, el Servicio de Retransmisión de California (CRS) para TTY/VCO/HCO a Voz o para Voz a TTY/VCO/HCO al (800) 855-3000 y pedir que lo conecten al (415) 778-6700. Necesitamos aviso de al menos tres días hábiles de anticipación para proporcionar la asistencia adecuada.

Do you need one of our documents translated? Do you need written materials in large type or in Braille? Do you need a sign language interpreter or an interpreter who speaks your language in order to participate?

To request accommodation, please call (415) 778-6757. For TDD or hearing impaired, call 711, California Relay Service, or (800) 735-2929 (TTY), (800) 735-2922 (voice) and ask to be relayed to (415) 778-6700. We require at least three working days’ notice to accommodate requests.

For more information visit Public Transit Revenue Measure District.

Allen D. Payton contributed to this report.

Acalanes High School and Stanley Intermediate were placed on lockdown by Lafayette police Monday, Aug. 17, 2026. Photo sources: acalanes61.com and Stanley Wildcats PTA Facebook page

By Allen D. Payton

The Lafayette Police Department placed Acalanes High School and Stanley Intermediate School on lockdown Monday afternoon, Aug. 17, 2026, due to an anonymous called in threat.

At 12:59 p.m. and 1:29 p.m. the Department posted alerts on Nixle, a service that sends out text messages about critical events in the community, with links on the department’s Facebook page.

They read:

“Officers are working a potential threat that was called into Acalanes High School by an annomoyous [sic] automated call. The lock down is a precaution. Avoid the area. Updates will be sent via Nixle.

“Oficers [sic] are on site and have drones over the school.”

and

“POLICE ACTIVITY – Officers are at Stanley Intermediate School while they determine if there is a viable threat that was called in.   It appears to be a swatting call, but are taking it seriously.

Officers will remain on campus and updates will be sent via Nixle.

If you see something call 9-1-1

94549TIP@gmail.com
925-284-5010 24 hour dispatch.”

By 1:47 p.m. and 1:52 p.m. All Clear messages were posted.

They read:

“All Clear – Acalanes High School Lockdown has been lifted. officers have completed a thorough search of the school, campus clear.

UPDATE: School Campus Cleared

Law enforcement officers have completed a thorough search of the school and determined that the campus is clear. There is no active threat to students, staff, or the surrounding community.

Officers will remain on site as a precaution while the incident is investigated. Preliminary information indicates this was likely a ‘swatting’ call—a false report intended to prompt a large emergency response.

Thank you for your patience and cooperation.”

and:

“All Clear- Stanley Intermediate School lockdown has been lifted, officers have completed a search of the school.

UPDATE: School Campus Cleared

Law enforcement officers have completed a thorough search of the school and determined that the campus is clear. There is no active threat to students, staff, or the surrounding community.

Officers will remain on site as a precaution while the incident is investigated. Preliminary information indicates this was likely a ‘swatting’ call—a false report intended to prompt a large emergency response.

Thank you for your patience and cooperation.”

According to the FBI, “Swatting is the malicious tactic of making hoax calls or reports to emergency services, typically feigning an immediate threat to life. Swatting is intended to draw a large response from SWAT teams or other law enforcement resources to an unsuspecting victim’s location, causing chaos and the potential for injury or violence.

“Targets of swatting often include high-profile public figures, as well as schools, hospitals, places of worship, and centers of mass transportation, but anyone can be a victim. A swatting incident may be an isolated event targeting one victim or part of a larger coordinated effort to target multiple victims.”